Subscribe by Email

Your email:

Blog: PSIM Trends

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

PSIM Named a Top 5 Technology by SIs

Submit to Digg digg it |  Add to delicious  delicious |  Submit to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon | Submit to Reddit reddit 

This week SDM highlighted The Top 5 Technologies for 2010 in a survey of the 100 largest systems integrators.  These leading integrators named integration platforms, and specifically physical security information management (PSIM), as number 4 on the Top 5 list of technologies that would have the biggest impact on their businesses this year.  This is great news, although not surprising given the challenges many security organizations face today.  With numerous security devices and systems that provide real time information, operators are inundated with data.  It is not correlated in any form or fashion therefore making sense of the data is difficult and getting the right information to the right people at the right time to ensure the best response is even more difficult - never mind tracking responses for compliance. 

PSIM brings together the data and event information and correlates and analyzes it to identify and prioritize situations that need attention – and provides step-by-step instructions for resolving situations and tracking them.  It intelligently brings information directly to the people who need it, when they need it. As PSIM gains market adoption and even greater acceptance by the SI community, we anticipate the power of PSIM will revolutionize how security organizations operate and will greatly enhance the safety and security of those organizations.

Public/Private Information Sharing for Mutual Benefit

Submit to Digg digg it |  Add to delicious  delicious |  Submit to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon | Submit to Reddit reddit 
Leischen Stelter of Security Director News wrote on Jan. 26 about the newly forged relationship between John Hopkins Medicine and the Baltimore Police Department.  The article discusses the two entities' plans to share information between their video surveillance systems, highlighting how this move is mutually beneficial - Hopkins improves its surveillance capabilities while the city increases its own surveillance capabilities by 25 percent.

This agreement is an example of how, more and more, public and private entities are coordinating in order to improve security.  By sharing resources, both parties are able to access more information in order to improve situation management as events occur.

However, sharing resources means more information for security personnel to sort through.  The article highlights the use of video analytic technology by the hospital as a tool to help with all of the video streaming in and the ability of it to alert dispatchers to any potential situations, but also points out that it's primarily used for historic reporting.

As technology continues to emerge that helps both public and private organizations improve security, shifting situation management from historic (or forensic) to proactive is crucial.  Here is where PSIM comes in - it integrates all of the data from all sources including video cameras and video analytic technology, provides a common set of services for analyzing and managing the incoming information, monitors for changes and automatically provides instructions or takes actions. 

As public and private coordination becomes more commonplace, PSIM technology, which includes video sharing and information sharing as two crucial components, will continue to play the critical role in tying existing security ecosystems together to help make security proactive.

Security Information Integration is No Longer Just a Dream

Submit to Digg digg it |  Add to delicious  delicious |  Submit to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon | Submit to Reddit reddit 
An interesting article on SecurityPark.co.uk by Gary Ball last week highlights a number of the challenges faced when trying to have a complete and total security solution. Two key failings of most security systems he mentions are:

1) Coexistence of Cyberspace, Personnel and Physical Security - without integration, there are holes in the security plan

2) Lack of automation - Automation is difficult to achieve in physical security, as the author points out, because, "physical security has only been effective when used with trained operators to monitor and interpret in real time the events displayed on their monitors." You cannot automate something solely managed by humans.

At the end of his article, he asks who will "make the bold moves to develop new solutions to these problems."  However, this has already begun with the introduction of Physical Security Information Management (PSIM).  Here's how....

1) PSIM integrates any number and variety of disparate physical security and surveillance assets into one operating picture, making relevant, real-time information available at a responder's fingertips. Now, with most assets within an organization being network-based, this interoperability is crucial (and effectively links together cyberspace, personnel and physical security).

2) A true PSIM solution takes situation assessment and management from a reactionary mode to a proactive mode, allowing organizations to apply intelligence to the information from various physical security devices and systems, determine the cause of the alarms and then automate the resolution of the situation. This helps reduce false alarms and eliminate human error.

PSIM is a rapidly growing industry that analysts predict will continue to grow for the very reasons Gary Ball outlines in his article - we need a way to integrate all of our security assets in order to take a proactive approach to situation management. 

In a time of crisis, when seconds matter most…

Submit to Digg digg it |  Add to delicious  delicious |  Submit to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon | Submit to Reddit reddit 
Last week the Miracle on the Hudson drove home the importance of everything coming together to turn what could have been a disastrous loss of life into a celebration of a hero.   Once the birds hit the plane there was no time for reading a manual, no time for a call to the tower to ask for help, no time for second guessing.  A less experienced pilot may not have been able to react so quickly, may not have known all the things to look for or the order to run them.

Not all emergencies are as extreme as landing a plane on a river but each situation brings its own challenges and urgencies.  While we would like to believe that all of our security professionals are equally trained for every situation we also know the reality is we are not.  Faced with a variety of situations we could use a little help from our technology.  That's where PSIM comes in.  It's not all about collecting and displaying information from multiple systems.  That's important, but more importantly it's about a quick and safe resolution to the situation.  In an emergency, when time matters, for a PSIM solution to effectively address a situation it can't be a partial solution, it needs to address at least four basic services:

  1. Collecting information from a variety of devices and systems in real time.
  2. Analyzing the information to identifying situations.
  3. Providing a visual of the situation for verification.
  4. Providing instructions or executing actions to help resolve the situation.

The few seconds saved up front by collecting the right information early in the emergency and being able to verify it quickly so you know what you are facing can shave minutes or more off the response time downstream.  In resolving a situation quickly, it's not just knowing what to do, it's making sure you are chasing the right problem.

While all emergencies we face may not be critical or life threatening, when you are the victim or need help, it may seem that way to you.

International Association of Chiefs of Police...meet PSIM

Submit to Digg digg it |  Add to delicious  delicious |  Submit to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon | Submit to Reddit reddit 

I've never felt safer than I did this week as I attended the International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP)conference.

Among the myriad of guns, uniforms, badges and mobile command vehicles were a number of really interesting technologies that are being used to enable law enforcement professionals to respond to emergencies faster and safer (which of course keeps us safer too).  Cool technologies like ShotSpotter (gun shot detection), in-car information and video systems, multiple video streams pumped to an iPhone (by Lextech ) allowing first responders to control a camera with just a touch of their finger, or camera based video analytics that can tell a person from an animal at over a quarter mile away (day or night) are helping departments get earlier information on evolving situations.  In addition high speed networks and cross agency communications systems coupled with automated mass notification systems like At Hoc provide faster ways to respond to situations.

Let's face it...the more information we can get to an officer as he goes into a situation the faster, more effectively and safer he  can handle the situation.  But there is a point of information overload and it's less about pushing data and more about digesting it to provide REAL TIME INTELLIGENCE that can be pinpointed to the needs of each officer or first responder. Knowing there is a suspect in the bushes with a gun may be information that is fatally late 10 seconds from now.

To me these were the coolest products and demonstrations.  Tying together all kinds of sensor info or human input, analyzing it to determine what was happening, mapping it, displaying appropriate cameras, and in seconds automatically dispatching targeted assistance, notifying the appropriate first responders and agencies and coordination their activities.  In an industry notorious for no standards and isolated systems, Cisco's booth was an oasis of interconnected systems from 15 different vendors.  Not just connected but through Command Center products from Intergraph and VidSys they were actually interacting to demonstrate how they work together to address real emergency  scenarios.  

IACP...meet PSIM.  You now have a new weapon and life will never be the same.

Are Your Physical Security Operations…Autopsy or Preventive Care?

Submit to Digg digg it |  Add to delicious  delicious |  Submit to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon | Submit to Reddit reddit 
How would you classify your Physical Security system?    When there is a situation do you scramble to collect the information from multiple systems and find yourself responding forensically?  On a scale of 1-10 how do you rate your ability to resolve a situation as it is happening and before it becomes critical?

Most of us, if we are honest, find ourselves combing through recorded video, alarm records and access control logs after the fact to determine what actually happened.  This is quickly followed by a round of placing blame, demands for new technology and procedures to try to respond faster the next time.  Maybe even a new round of administrative policies that mandate we do better the next time.

The truth is, the situations we are facing are increasingly more complex and require the synthesis of information from multiple sources.  The more technology we throw at individual problems the more information we generate and therefore the more we have to analyze to determine what is going on.  While we are spending millions deploying the latest technologies, in the end it can come down to how fast an operator can wheel between multiple consoles to figure out what is going on and how to respond.

If we truly want to get the most from our investments we need to integrate our physical security technologies into a system that can turn all this information into early warning systems that tell us what is happening.   PSIM software, industry standards, open systems, and customer demand for integration are key to turning our command centers from morgues, to emergency rooms and ultimately preventive care centers.  

Respond to this week's poll and let us know how you rate your ability to resolve a situation?  And don't be shy - we would like to hear your opinions on what is holding you back from providing the right care.  What obstacles are you facing?  What's getting in the way? We're sure you're not alone...

Lead, Follow, or Get out of the way!

Submit to Digg digg it |  Add to delicious  delicious |  Submit to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon | Submit to Reddit reddit 

The first time I heard this saying it was relative to management style in a fast moving startup company.   The basic message was...if you see a problem, take a leadership role and fix it, or team with other people to fix it.  Doing nothing was not an option.

Some months back I was speaking with a number of corporate physical security professionals and technology supplier execs about the state of the Physical Security market and this saying leapt to mind. A common theme was the amount of money that was being spent to try and integrate and manage all the disparate security systems in their organizations.   Over the last 4-5 years analysts say we have spent over $250B+ (yes ...billion) on technology for physical security  yet often I hear that we have not substantially lowered the risk to our facilities, people or operations.   Equally interesting, despite the application of all kinds of new and more effective networks and security technology to lower our risk and increase the efficiency and effectiveness of our  security, we continue to spend increasing amounts of money (growing  at 3.5-5% per year) on hiring guards to augment the security technology  (Lehman 2007 Security Industry Report). 

While there are lots of reasons for this situation, one that stands out for me is our inability to intelligently integrate and leverage all the investments we have made in security assets.   We can blame it on a lack of standards, or on unwillingness of vendors to open up their APIs, or the speed in which technology is changing,  but at the end of the day  we all know that "doing nothing about it" is a ticket to our own industry's version of a wall street meltdown.

It's not like we haven't been here before (love the double negative?).  We went through this with networking, system management, data bases, and information security management.   And in each case the leadership of a number of companies and organizations in providing innovative integration software and initiating standards  efforts helped to stimulate not only the growth of the industry but the cost effectiveness of it as well.  It's time for the Physical Security market to follow suit.

With the introduction of this site we are working towards a similar model.  Bringing together industry experts and companies who have an interest in sharing information about the state of the state of the art in Physical Security Information Management (PSIM).  PSIM is the industry term for integrating multiple disparate security devices and systems into an intelligent system that helps increase the security of an organization while lowering risk and improving operational effectiveness and efficiency. 

If this is an area of interest for you I encourage you to get actively involved with the discussions on this site.  Take a leadership role in directing the industry.  At a minimum this site will offer a way to stay up to date on what likely is the fastest moving area of the physical security market.  Given the speed of change we are facing maybe the right message is...

Lead, follow or become road kill.

 

All Posts